CALCULATED RISKS GERD GIGERENZER PDF
Calculated Risks has ratings and 46 reviews. Gerd Gigerenzer möchte uns mit seinem Buch “Das Einmaleins der Skepsis” zwei wichtige Dinge vermitteln. Cognitive scientist Gerd Gigerenzer says that because we haven’t learned statistical thinking, we don’t understand risk and uncertainty. In order to assess risk. Gerd Gigerenzer and Adrian Edwards. Bad presentation of .. the United States as Calculated risks: how to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon.
|Published (Last):||27 January 2013|
|PDF File Size:||4.9 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.39 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Kindle Cloud Reader Read instantly in your browser. But in absolute risks, that means that out of every 1, women who do not participate in screening, 4 will die; while out of 1, women who do, calculatee will die. His book is a successful attempt to help innumerates those who don’t understand statisticsoffering case studies of people who calculate need to understand statistics, including those working in AIDS counseling, DNA fingerprinting and domestic violence cases.
Calculated Risks | Book by Gerd Gigerenzer | Official Publisher Page | Simon & Schuster
Of, the remaining women who don’t have breast cancer, 70 will have a positive mammogram false positives. Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. Refresh and try again.
See all Editorial Reviews. In contrast, natural frequencies result from natural sampling, the process by which humans and animals have encountered information about ris during most of their evolution. Jun 07, Dick Hamilton rated it really liked it. This was not inaccurate, just misleading. Lawyers will confuse juries, judges, reporters, and themselves over what a person having a match to crime scene DNA means about that person’s likelihood of guilt.
Gerd Gigerenzer is a German psychologist who has studied calvulated use of bounded rationality and ggigerenzer in decision making, especially in medicine.
Calculated Risks: How to know when numbers deceive you: Gerd Gigerenzer
People have had breasts removed on the basis of faulty screening that they gigerenzet enticed into receiving gjgerenzer the impressively high but mostly irrelevant measure of relative, versus absolute, risk reduction. But in absolute risks, that means that out of every 1, women who do not participate in screening, 4 will die; while out of 1, women who do, 3 will die.
So are many people who seek certainty through numbers, says Gigerenzer, a statistician and behavioral scientist. There are all sorts of things that can generate a false positive result.
The actual risk was small because the test gives many false positives. Customers who bought this item also bought. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. Books by Gerd Gigerenzer.
Ma garantisco che lo stesso materiale io l’avrei condensato in duecento pagine. It suggests that instead of using percentages when talking about probabilities we should be using natural frequencies which are easier for us to understand and remember and also which usually represent the truth instead of leading the reader of those statistics astray by accident or by intentional deception. I used to believe, but the author shook my firm believe in this.
I think I’ve gotten the best and most in-depth explanations of these problems I’ve ever read. But even DNA evidence can produce spurious matches. Because they’re bad at math and generally dishonest, lawyers will argue that the probability of innocence is equal to a chance match, which is usually abysmally low and therefore argues for guilt.
If you are interested in this subject, I strongly recommend: May 11, Kris Fabick rated it liked it. One can still use probability and apply Bayes law to have the same answer more ‘accurate’ answer, some will insist. This eye-opening book explains how we can overcome our ignorance of numbers and better understand the risks we may be taking with our money, our gerc, and our lives.
Figerenzer, most doctors convey this level of accuracy after the very first test! This knowledge is timeless, and to focus in on just one area the book covers: Amazon Music Ris,s millions of terd. Although we are living in the era of so-called “big data”, most people are still surprisingly incapable of understanding uncertainties in their situations and making decisions out of it.
Jul 29, Nayef Ahmad rated it it was amazing. But even DNA evidence can produce spurious matches. This books shows that, just as for the prostate screening also discussed here and in the February SciAm article, if this woman is average, without an undue risk factor present I don’t knowthen this course of action is almost certainly producing more harm psychologically and financially than benefit.
I hope I have been able to give you a flavor for what’s in this book.
At the foundation of the above confusions lies the interpretation of Baye’s rule. A false positive is a test result that says, ‘yes, the person has the virus,’ when actually the person doesn’t. A critic of the work of Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, he argues that heuristics should not lead us to conceive of human thinking as riddled with irrational cognitive biases, but rather to conceive rationality as an adaptive tool that is not identica Gerd Gigerenzer is a German psychologist who has studied the use of bounded rationality and heuristics in decision making, especially in medicine.
The authors of the SciAm article used precisely the same simple techniques for analyzing the data as are presented in this book, and these techniques were part of the revelation that was making the story news for the magazine! Not Enabled Word Wise: In this book, professor Gigerenzer says risk innumeracy stems more from representation of risks rather than from one’s IQ. Mich hat dieses Buch sehr fasziniert und begeistert. In a two-year period, this doctor convinced 90 “high-risk” women without cancer to sacrifice their breasts “in a heroic exchange for the certainty of saving their lives and protecting their loved ones from suffering and loss.
Despite regarding my maths skill above the average, I didn’t know how to deal with the false positive and negative rates. Out of without cancer, about 70 will still test positive. I myself has encountered such a false positive. To avoid confusion, says Gigerenzer, we should rely on more understandable representations of risk, such as absolute risks.
Amazon Giveaway ger you to run promotional giveaways in order to create buzz, reward your audience, and attract new followers and customers.
Frank Furedi on the global warming apocalypse. He wants to make these numbers more comprehensible since must of us are plagued by “innumeracy,” the inability to think in numbers. The actual risk was small because the test gives many false positives.